RED 4519


Diagnosis and Instructional Interventions

 

M I A M I  -  D A D E   C O L L E G E       F A L L  2 0 0 4

 

Dr. Melinda Prague    

 

Course Description

 

  •  

ppt 

Calendar

 

  •  

ppt links

Grading Scale

 

  •  

 

Resources

"Do it anyway" photostory

 

 

Instructor:

Dr. Melinda Prague

Office:

School of Education - Miami-Dade College

Interamerican Campus Room 1345

Phone

(305) 237-6075

E-mail:

mprague@mdc.edu 

Textbook(s):

  • Diagnostic Teaching of Reading, by Barbara J. Walker. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2004.

  • Reading Inventory for the Classroom, 5th Edition, by E. Sutton Flynt and Robert B. Cooter, Jr.  Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2004.

  • LiveText eportfolio

Bibliography

Melinda Prague has been an educator for more than 25 years. She received a B.A. and a Masters in Secondary Education from the University of Miami and a Doctorate in Reading from Hofstra University. Prague, an Education professor at the InterAmerican Campus, is the Campus Coordinator for Training and Development. Prague received the Eduardo J. Padron Endowed Teaching Chair in 2000. In 2001 she receive the NISOD Teaching Excellence Award. She has received the Wolfson Campus Commitment to Excellence Award in 1993, and 1995. Prague is in the 1994 Who's Who Among America's Teachers. She is also to be included in the 2001 edition of Who’s Who of Professionals. She was named as the faculty "Ambassador of Goodwill" in the College Forum (1999), recognizing her commitment to serving the college community as well as putting "students first". In 1993 she was a recipient of an NEH grant entitled, “Drama and the Humanities” In 1992 she was appointed as the college-wide writing coordinator for IBM’s Project Synergy. In September of 1999 she initiated a "Reading Buddy" Program” with Auburndale Elementary School. To date the program has trained more than 50 volunteers who have provided more than 800 hours of service.

 

 

Course Expectations                     UP

 

Course goals:

All work is to be of college quality and is to be electronically processed. Work must be submitted via WebCtT and LiveText. Since prospective teachers are to serve as role models for their own students, Written work will be evaluated on the basis of content, grammar, spelling, and usage. No credit will be given for work that is submitted past the assigned due date.

 

Course description:                                                   TOP

This course introduces formal and informal methods and materials used to identify reading strengths and weaknesses of students. Topics include assessments of all aspects of reading, including comprehension, word recognition, and phonics. The main emphasis is diagnosis of reading problems, administration of assessments, evaluation of results, and planning instructional interventions to remediate reading difficulties. A minimum of 20 hours of structured field experience is required. Pre-requisite: RED 3309.

 

Location: Wolfson Room 2203

Meeting day(s): Tuesdays and Thursdays

Meeting time(s): 11:15 - 12:30

Prerequisite(s): RED 3309

Required Assessments

 

Introduction:

Mid-term Evaluation -- 25% of grade 

Final Evaluation -- 25% of grade *

Journal containing observations and assignments – 20% of grade 

**Administering and Reporting results of an informal reading inventory–30% of grade 

*A journal will be kept to record observations and assignments made for the course. 

Twenty (20) hours of classroom observation and/or teaching will be required. 

**This is an Artifact. Any student who does not satisfactorily complete an Artifact must consult with the professor about how to make up the grade.

 

 II Required Textbooks

  • Diagnostic Teaching of Reading, by Barbara J. Walker. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2004.

  • Reading Inventory for the Classroom, 5th Edition, by E. Sutton Flynt and Robert B. Cooter, Jr.  Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2004.

  • LiveText eportfolio

 

III Supplementary Readings and References

  • Barr, R., Blachowicz, C., and Wogman-Sadow, M.  Reading Diagnosis for Teachers: An Instructional Approach, 3rd Edition.  White Plains, N.Y.: Longman, 1995.

  • Glazer, S.M., and Brown, C.S. Portfolios and Beyond:  Collaborative Assessment in Reading and Writing.  Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon, 1993.


Course Calendar BY WEEK                                         TOP

1

8/23

 

Introduction to course, grading policies, and procedures

 

2

 

 

 

8/30

 

Chap. 1, “What is Diagnostic Teaching?”

Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Word Study

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164689-,00.html

3

 

 

9/6

 

Chap. 2, “The Reading Event”

Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Comprehension

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164704-,00.html

 

4

 

 

9/13

 

Chap. 3, “Roles of Diagnostic Teachers”

Assignment: Reread the chapter summary. Explain your view of a diagnostic teacher, and do a self-assessment telling whether or not you feel you could fit the description given in your textbook. Due next class. FEAP 3 

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

The Writing Process

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164719-,00.html

 

5

 

 

9/20

 

Chap. 4, “The Diagnostic Teaching Session: An Overview”

Assignments:   Have a student read aloud a passage or a few paragraphs from a textbook that he/she has not yet been assigned. Then ask the student to use the Chart for Self-Evaluation of Fluency (Table 4-1) and the Chart for Self-Assessment of Comprehension Strategies (Table 4-4). Report the results. Analyze the value of such assessment tools. Due next class. FEAP

6

 

 

9/27

 

Chap. 5, “Gathering Diagnostic Data”

Assignments:  Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Emergent Literacy

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164734-,00.html

 

7

 

 

10/4

 

Chap. 6, “Formulating Diagnostic Hypotheses”

Assignment:  Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

 

Children’s Literature

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164749-,00.html

 

8

 

 

10/11

Mid-term Evaluation

 Chap. 7, “Assessment Using Diagnostic Lessons”

Assignment:  Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Visual Literacy

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164764-,00.html

 

9

 

10/18

 

Chap. 8, “Assessment Using Portfolios”

Assignment:  In your journal, describe how artifacts may be assembled into a portfolio to show a student’s progress in reading.

10

 

 

10/25

 

Topic:  Using the results of standardized reading tests

Assignment:  Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Assessment

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164794-,00.html

11

 

 

 

11/1

 

Chap. 9, “Selecting Materials”

Assignment:  Assignment:  Read and Study Chapter

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Standards

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164779-,00.html

 

12

 

 

11/8

 

Introduction to the Reading Inventory for the Classroom

Assignment:  Read and Study

Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Fluency

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164830-,00.html  

 

13

 

 

11/15

 

Administration and Scoring Procedures for the Reading Inventory for the Classroom

Assignment:  Visit web site: Read the overview, review the strategies, and web links.

Be prepared to discuss chapter and web site in class.

Literacy and Technology

http://wps.prenhall.com/chet_literacy_cluster_1/0,8776,1164815-,00.html

 

14

 

11/22

 

Class time to work on eportfolios

www.livetext.com

Assignment Due: Completed Journal and all activities.

 

15

 

11/29

 

Chap. 10, “Selecting Techniques”

Assignment: Read and Study Chapter

Be prepared to discuss in class.

Assignment Due: School Based Hours

16

12/6

12/13

Final Evaluation

 

DIAGNOSIS AND INSTRUCTIONAL INTERVENTION IN READING

Reading 4519

School Based Assignments

Assignment #1

Interview a classroom teacher. Ask him/her about the students who have difficulty in reading in the classroom. What percentage of the students has difficulty? What adjustments are made in working with these students? Report your findings in your journal.

Assignment #2

Observe a classroom at your school site. Notice the behaviors of students who appear to have difficulty with reading their texts. Do you see any ways in which their needs are addressed by differentiated assignments, ability grouping, or other arrangements helping them deal with the material they are assigned? Report your findings. FEAP 5                

Assignment #3

Have a student read aloud a passage or a few paragraphs from a textbook that he/she has not yet been assigned. Then ask the student to use the Chart for Self-Evaluation of Fluency (Table 4-1) and the Chart for Self-Assessment of Comprehension Strategies (Table 4-4). Report the results. Analyze the value of such assessment tools. FEAP 1

Assignment #4

Administer the MARSI (Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory) to a middle school or high school student. Report the results. Explain how this inventory might be useful in working with a secondary school student with reading difficulties. FEAP 1

Assignment #5

Have a student read a few paragraphs from a content area textbook used in his/her class. Based on miscues alone, decide if the textbook is at the student’s frustration level, instructional level, or independent reading level. Explain the process you used to come to this conclusion. FEAP 8

Assignment #6

Design and teach a diagnostic lesson using the procedure outlined in your textbook. Report the results. FEAP 10

Assignment #7

Design a cloze procedure using a passage from a textbook in the classroom you are observing. Administer the assessment; then decide if the book is a good match to use in instructing the student. FEAP 8

Assignment #8

Interview a classroom teacher at your school site to identify a student who is having reading difficulties. Meet with the student and do an interest/attitude interview. FEAP 2    

Assignment #9

Administer the Reading Inventory for the Classroom, using the student you have selected. Tape the student’s reading of the passages and answers for the questions. Report the results of the inventory. FEAP 1

Assignment #10

Select two teaching techniques described in your textbook; use these with the student you have tested. Describe the results in your journal. FEAP 8, FEAP 10

Course Requirements & Expectations

        A.      Attendance & WITHDRAWAL POLICY

Students are expected to attend class regularly.  Three unexcused absences will result in the student being dropped from the course.  The college has established a “drop date” by which a student must officially drop in order to receive a grade of W (withdrawal).

B.     Assignments

All work is to be of college quality and is to be electronically processed.

Work must be submitted via WebCtT and LiveText.

Since prospective teachers are to  serve as role models for their own students, Written work will be evaluated on the basis of content, grammar, spelling, and usage. 

No credit will be given for work that is submitted past the assigned due date. 

 

C.EXAMS

There will be 2 major exams in the course.  These exams will cover material from lectures, the textbooks, and assigned supplementary readings.

D. Grading Scale                                         TOP 

The grading scale for the course work in the School of Education is:

100 – 90         A

89 – 80           B

79 – 70           C

69 – 60           D (Repeat course)

below 60         F (Repeat course)

 Course Competencies:

Competency #1: The student will demonstrate knowledge of the reading process by

  1. identifying physical, psychological, socioeconomic, and educational factors that impact student success in reading.
  2. identifying competencies that students should achieve in their progression through the grades by using a scope and sequence of reading skills.
  3. comparing and contrasting traditional diagnosis and remediation with current trends in assessment and instruction of struggling readers.

Competency #2:  The student will demonstrate knowledge of formal and informal methods of assessing students’ reading abilities by:

a.   identifying, administering, and interpreting results from a variety of traditional measures appropriate for assessing reading skills, including Informal Reading Inventories.

b.   evaluating students’ literacy development by means of a variety of forms of authentic assessment, including observational checklists, anecdotal records, student performance, and portfolios.

c.   administering and assessing a reading miscue analysis for an individual student.

d.   identifying the strengths and weaknesses of group standardized, individual standardized, and informal measuring instruments.

e.   developing and utilizing interest inventories.

f.    assessing a student’s level of comprehension by using a cloze procedure.

g.   identifying appropriate diagnostic techniques for discovering students’ dominant modalities, cognitive styles, and learning rates.

h.   utilizing a diagnostic flowchart to complete a diagnosis of reading skills in an efficient manner.

i.    evaluating a student’s reading levels, including independent reading level, instructional reading level, and frustration level.

j.    describing characteristics of students with specific learning

k.   disabilities, hyperactivity, and attentional deficit disorder.

Competency #3:  The student will demonstrate proficiency in communicating student progress by:

a.   maintaining observational and anecdotal records to document students’ reading skill development in phonics, vocabulary, comprehension, and study skills.

b.   keeping systematic and appropriate records to document assessment of students who have been diagnosed as having difficulties with learning to read.

c.   making appropriate referrals to specialists as needed for students experiencing unusual difficulties in learning to read.

d.   demonstrating ways to accurately communicate diagnostic information to administrators, counselors, and other support personnel.

e.   communicating effectively with the remedial student so that he/she is aware of his/her progress.

f.     describing ways to have positive interaction with a student to encourage and support learning.

 

Competency #4:  The student will demonstrate proficiency in planning methods and strategies for a remediation program by:

a.   analyzing standardized and/or classroom assessment to determine cognitive, social, linguistic, cultural, emotional, and physical needs prior to instructional planning.

b.   designing and implementing a plan that is highly individualized and directed toward correcting specific reading deficiencies in a student.

c.   designing lesson plans to remediate specific skill weaknesses in the area of comprehension.

d.   describing strategies for teaching word identification skills (sight words, context clues, phonics, structural analysis).

e.  designing lessons to remediate skill weaknesses in the area of vocabulary development.

f.   utilizing a variety of teaching strategies and activities to interest and motivate students at different developmental levels.

g.  creating a positive learning environment in which students are actively engaged in learning, social interaction, and cooperation.

h.   utilizing technology in lesson and material preparation.

Competency #5:  The student will demonstrate skill in selecting resources to be used in remediation by

  1. selecting instructional materials that are appropriate to the needs
  2. and interests of the student
  3. identifying reading games that provide reinforcement of word
  4. recognition and phonics skills.
  5. identifying high-interest, low-vocabulary materials for use with
  6. older students having severe reading deficiencies.
  7. selecting materials that are at appropriate readability levels for students.
  8. selecting and utilizing appropriate software for remedial reading instruction.

 

REQUIRED ASSESSMENTS  

Mid-term Evaluation --   25% of grade

Final Evaluation        --   25% of grade

*Journal containing observations and assignments – 20% of grade 

**Administering and reporting results of an informal reading inventory–30% of grade

*A journal will be kept to record observations and assignments made for the course.

Classroom observation and teaching will be required.

**This is an Artifact. Any student who does not satisfactorily complete

 an Artifact must consult with the professor about how to make up the  

 grade.

ARTIFACT RUBRIC

Scoring criteria

Target

(3 points)

Acceptable

(2 points)

Unacceptable

(1 points)

Inventories properly administered

 

 

 

Miscue analysis and other forms correctly completed

 

 

 

Analysis of student’s deficiencies correct and insightful

 

 

 

Appropriateness of suggested remediation strategies

 

 

 

Written report uses correct grammar and conventions of English

 

 

 

Note:  A score of 13 or more points will be considered as satisfactory completion of this Artifact Assignment.

 

 Academic Integrity

Please be aware that I support the College’s policies about academic integrity and honesty.

This includes their policies regarding cheating, plagiarism, and fabrication of information. It is your responsibility to fully understand what those policies are; as such, you are encouraged to get a copy of and read these policies carefully and thoroughly (Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook).

A. Cheating - The improper taking or tendering of any information or material which shall be used to determine academic credit.  Taking of information includes, but is not limited to, copying graded homework assignments from another student; working together with another individual(s) on a take-home test or homework when not specifically permitted by the instructor; looking or attempting to look at another student’s paper during an examination and; looking or attempting to look at text or notes during an examination when not permitted.  Tendering of information includes, but is not limited to, giving your work to another student to be used or copied; giving someone answers to exam questions either when the exam is being given or after having taken an exam; giving or selling a term paper or other written materials to another student; sharing information on a graded assignment.

B. Plagiarism - The attempt to represent the work of another as the product of one’s own thought, whether the other’s work is published or unpublished, or simply the work of a fellow student.  Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, quoting oral or written materials without citation on an exam, term paper, homework, or other written materials or oral presentations for an academic requirement; submitting a paper which was purchased from a term paper service as your own work; submitting anyone else’s paper as your own work.

Copyright law

 

 

 

| Miami-Dade College  |  Wolfson Campus  |  contact me: mprague@mdc.edu | webmaster: Rafael Mendiola  |

 

 

Rafael Mendiola

Reflection paper What is Diagnostic Teaching?

 

RESOURCES

                                         TOP

Running Record

a detailed description and how to score the running record

http://www.readinga-z.com/guided/runrec/scoring.html 

http://www.readinga-z.com/guided/runrec/forms.html

http://www.readinga-z.com/guided/runrec/scoring.html

 

Running Record Analysis

Implementing standards-based instruction and assessment in the classroom

Building Bridges > Virtual Conference

RETA NMSU 

(New Mexico State Department of Education)

Curriculum and Assessment Traditional vs. standards-based curriculum

RETA NMSU

Literacy Merrill Education > Prentice Hall Companion Website
What every parent should know about testing Educational Testing Service

ETS

(How to interpret Standardized Test Scores)

Measurement and Testing UCLA
The Nation's Report Card NAEP

National Assessment of Educational Progress

   
   
  Great stuff for teachers Newsletter teachervision

 

 

 

LINK

DISABILITIES & THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT

Testing Students with Disabilities [wwwcsteep.bc.edu/ctestweb/special/special.html]
The Consortium for Equity in Standards and Testing (CTEST) [http://wwwcsteep.bc.edu/ctest] offers an introduction, a bibliography of official documents, and links to pertinent news articles and Web sites in this portion of its Spotlight Issues [http://wwwcsteep.bc.edu/ctestweb/spotlight.html]. Interested readers may wish also to see CTEST's report entitled Standards-Based Reform and Students with Disabilities [http://wwwcsteep.bc.edu/ctestweb/special/dis.html].

ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC/EC) [http://www.cec.sped.org/er-menu.htm]
This clearinghouse of the U.S. Department of Education's Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), a long-term project also of the Council for Exceptional Children [http://www.cec.sped.org/], offers Frequently Asked Questions [http://www.cec.sped.org/ericec/faqs.htm] that provide a well-organized set of bibliographies arranged by disability or instructional approach. In its Directory of Current Projects [http://www.cec.sped.org/ericec/rsrchdir.htm], ERIC/EC offers descriptions of current research projects, including some in special education Assessment [http://www.cec.sped.org/osep/6assessm.htm].

Educational Testing Service (ETS) Office of Disability Policy [http://www.ets.org/disability.html]
Testing accommodations, registration instructions, procedures for the documentation of disabilities (including Recommendations for Consumers), and a directory of organizations for further assistance are covered here for the ETS family of achievement tests.

National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) [http://www.coled.umn.edu/NCEO/]
NCEO is a collaborative project of the University of Minnesota, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and the National Association of State Directors of Special Education that monitors, evaluates, and advises for best practices in large-scale assessments for accountability, with a special focus on the inclusion of students with disabilities in those assessment programs.

LISTSERVS FOR DISABILITIES ISSUES IN EDUCATION

Subscribe to: DSSHE-L - The Disabled Student Services in Higher Education Listserv.
[send e-mail to: LISTSERV@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU with message: Subscribe DSSHE-L yourfirstname yourlastname (omit signature)]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOSSARY

 

Intervention

An activity, process, event or system that is designed to correct a problem or change a situation and improve performance.

Link

Intervention Interventions are programs (for example, Accelerated Schools), products (for example, a textbook or a particular curriculum), practices (for example, mixed-age grouping), and policies (for example, class size reduction) that can be adopted by multiple schools and districts.

LINK

Fluency "freedom from word-identification problems that might hinder comprehension in silent reading or the expression of ideas in oral reading; automaticity" LINK
Assessment The processes used to collect information about student progress toward educational goals. The particular form of an assessment depends on what is being assessed and on uses to which results of the assessment will be applied. Assessments can range from small-scale assessments that teachers use in the classroom to obtain day-to-day information about student progress; through medium-scale assessments that school districts use to evaluate the effectiveness of schools or educational programs; all the way to large-scale assessments that state or national bodies use to assess the degree to which students have met large educational goals.
www.startest.com/glossary.html

The process of gathering evidence about a student’s knowledge of, ability to use, and disposition toward mathematics and of making inferences from that evidence for a variety of purposes. Assessment is a term that has often been used interchangeably with the terms testing, measurement, and evaluation, or to distinguish between student assessment and program evaluation. In this document, assessment is used as defined above to emphasize understanding and description of both qualitative and quantitative evidence in making judgments and decisions. See evaluation, measure, test.
standards.nctm.org/Previous/AssStds/Glossary.htm

A system of evaluation of professional accomplishments using defined criteria and usually including an attempt at measurement either by grading on a rough scale or by assigning numerical value. The purpose of assessment in an educational context is to make a judgment about the level of skills or knowledge, to measure improvement over time, to evaluate strengths and weaknesses, to rank students for selection or exclusion, or to motivate. Assessment should be as objective and reproducible as possible. A reliable test should produce the same or similar scores on two or more occasions or if given by two or more assessors. The validity of a test is determined by the extent to which it measures whatever it sets out to measure. One can distinguish three types of assessment:
www.iime.org/glossary.htm

Glossary.

LINK

Ability (aptitude) test
A test, not closely linked to a specific curriculum, that is used to predict a student's future performance.
Achievement test
A test that measures prior knowledge usually linked to a specific subject or course.
Computerized adaptive testing
Computerized testing that tailors the difficulty of the test to the individual test taker.
Criterion-referenced
A score that compares a student's performance to specific standards.
Grade equivalent score
A student's standing in relation to others in terms of grade and month in the school year.
Multiple-choice question
A question that requires students to select an answer from a list of answers.
Norm group
The group used as a point of comparison for a test.
Norm-referenced
A score that compares a student's performance to that of people in a norm group.
Percentile rank
A comparison of one student's score with the scores of people in the norm group.
Performance assessment
An observation of the process of creating an answer or product that demonstrates a student's knowledge and/or skills.
Portfolios
Collections of students' work over a period of time.
Reliability
An indication of how consistent test scores will be, given different testing conditions or editions of a test.
Standardized test
A test that is administered and scored under the same conditions for all students.
Stanine score
A score from a nine-point scale used in standardized tests.
Validity
The extent to which test scores actually reflect what they were meant to measure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter

Download Library PRAXIS >>>>

list of decodable books

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

316:021106:2109

269:102705:2144

245:081805:1818

221:070105:0929

213:051705:1140

180:030105:0101

144:012005:2338

139:011205:0117

135:011005:0102

128:122104:2147

124:121604:0837

102:120304:0832

92:112204:0022

81:111704:0001

72:110904:0238

67:110104:0040

58:101504:10:02

                  RafMen> F I N A L  School based assignmentes (backup for e-Portfolio)