|
Updated
October 12, 2004
| Due
Date |
|
| October
14 |
SECTION
II (STUDENTS) OF ASSESSMENT PLAN |
| October
28 |
QUIZ
2 (MCMILLAN CHAPTERS 6-10) |
| November
2 |
SECTION
III (SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT) OF ASSESSMENT PLAN |
| November
4 |
SECTION
IV (ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT) OF ASSESSMENT PLAN |
| November
16 |
SECTION
V ( REMEDIATION PLAN) AND VI ( REFLECTIONS) OF ASSESSMENT PLAN |
| November
18 |
QUIZ
3 (MCMILLAN CHAPTERS 11-13) |
|
|
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
PROFESSIONAL
CORE COURSE SYLLABUS
EDF 4430 – Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation (3
credits)
This syllabus, course calendar, and other attending documents
are subject to change during the semester in the event of extenuating
circumstances.
Prerequisite: MGF 1120, MGF 1106, STA 2014, STA
2023 OR comparable statistics course
Professor Information:
Name:
María M. Sifre-McMann
Office Hours:
7:15 PM-8:00 PM Phone: (305) 303-6842
Email: mcmann8325@bellsouth.net
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course is designed to study principles of traditional
and alternative assessment strategies, including behaviorist,
constructivist and transpersonal measures.
Topics include ensuring equity with authentic assessments,
rethinking assessment and its role in supporting educational reform,
integrating assessment and instruction in ways that support learning,
reporting assessment results and assessing the learner's progress
appropriately. In addition, the course will highlight acquiring an
understanding of the content measured by state achievement tests,
reading and interpreting data and using data to improve student
achievement. Finally, the course will enable the match of instructional
strategies to the learner's cognitive, social, linguistic, emotional and
physical needs. These competencies are based in part on the Florida
Educator Accomplished Practices.
II. REQUIRED TEXTBOOK(S), RESOURCES AND MATERIALS
TOP
Textbooks:
McMillian, James H. Classroom Assessment (3rd Edition).
Allyn and Bacon, 2004.
Resources:
Linn, Robert L. and Gronlund, Norman E. Measurement and
Assessment in Teaching (8th Edition). Prentice Hall, 2000.
Popham, James W. Classroom
Assessment (3rd Edition). Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
Costantino, Patricia M. and De Lorenzo, Marie N.
Developing a Professional Teaching Portfolio. Allyn and Bacon,
2002.
III. SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS AND REFERENCES
Electronic Resources/companion web site for the texts:
McMillan: http://www.ablongman.com/mcmillan2e
Linn: http://www.prenhall.com/linn
Florida
Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAPs):
http://www.firn.edu/doe/dpe/publications/preprofessional4-99.pdf
Florida
Teacher Certification Exam Competencies (FTCE) http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/ftce/pdf/ftcomp26.pdf
Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC): http://www.ccsso.org/contnet/pdfs/corestrd.pdf
Electronic Portfolios:
http://www.coe.iup.edu/njyost/portfolios/samples.html
http://www.cedu.niu.edu/tedu/portfolio/index.htm
Technology/Audio/Video
“Simulations in Assessment,” Version 1.0, Ohio:
Merrill Prentice Hall
“Guidelines for Making Decisions About IEP Services”,
Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall
“A New IDEA for Education”, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall
“Together We Can!”, Juniper Gardens Childrens Project,
Kansas City
“LifeLink ”, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall
V. SUPPLIES
A minimum of one CD-RW or a box of 3.5” floppy disks for
artifacts for electronic portfolio.
VI. COURSE REQUIREMENTS & EXPECTATIONS
A. Attendance/PARTICIPATION, WITHDRAWAL & INCOMPLETE POLICIES
Attendance and participation are required for optimal
learning. Attendance and promptness are mandatory and will be recorded
by the instructor. It is
the student’s responsibility to notify the instructor in advance of
any absence and to make-up all assignments.
It is the instructor’s prerogative to withdraw students with
more than three unexcused absences.
As a courtesy to all, it is expected that pagers and/or
cellular phones are silenced.
B. ASSIGNMENTS
Students are expected to complete every assignment by the
date it is due.
C. EXAMS
TOP
There will be three unit quizzes. There will be no make-ups
for these quizzes except for highly extenuating circumstances in which
the student presents a documented official excuse.
The instructor may exercise the prerogative of dropping the
lowest unit quiz score and adding those points to the final project.
Each quiz will be designed to examine your knowledge,
application, analysis and synthesis of the material presented in the
class, texts, and course materials.
The quizzes will be composed of objective items (multiple choice,
matching), interpretive exercises, short answer items and essay
questions.
D. GRADING SCALE
AND INCOMPLETE POLICY
|
Standard
Grading Scale
|
Class
Points
|
|
A: 90 – 100
|
180 - 200
|
|
B: 80 – 89
|
160 - 179
|
|
C: 70 – 79
|
140 - 159
|
|
D: 60 – 69
|
(must repeat course) 120 - 139
|
|
F: 50 – 59
|
(must repeat course) 119 or below
|
An Incomplete grade for the course is only available at the
discretion of the instructor for a documented emergency that prohibits
the student from completing the course.
The student must be passing and must have completed 75% of the
course at the time of the emergency. The student must request the grade
of incomplete and must agree to make up the missing work by a date
specified by the instructor or by the end of the next major term,
whichever is earlier. This agreement must be formalized by completing the
College’s Agreement for a Grade of Incomplete form.
E.
GRADING CRITERIA
TOP
Course grades will be determined by applying the standard
grading scale to a weighted average obtained as follows:
|
ACTIVITY
|
POINTS
|
|
Three Quizzes*
|
75
|
|
Create an Assessment Plan and Assessments**
|
75
|
|
Participation, including Peer Analyses and Case Studies
|
50
|
|
POSSIBLE TOTAL POINTS
|
200
|
*You are encouraged to complete the interactive self-quizzes
at the companion web site for the Linn text (www.prenhall.com/linn) and the web site for
the McMillan text (http://ablongman.com/mcmillan2e).
**See rating scales and rubric accompanying this syllabus for
expectations, and scoring instruments.
See course calendar for other assignments required in the
course. Assignments must be successfully completed in order to pass the
course. If an assignment does not receive a passing score, the
instructor will work with the student to improve performance.
VII. ALTERNATE INSTRUCTION/LEARNING SUPPORT CENTERS
Students who need help completing assignments or with work
in-class are encouraged to see the instructor.
VIII. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) STATEMENT:
Students who have a disability that might affect their
performance in this class are encouraged to contact Access Services, in
confidence, as soon as possible. The phone number is ________.
IX. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
The instructor supports the College’s policies regarding
academic integrity and honesty. These
include the policies regarding cheating, plagiarism, and fabrication of
information. It is your
responsibility to understand fully what these policies are.
As such, you are encouraged to obtain a copy of the Student
Rights and Responsibilities Handbook and read these policies carefully
and thoroughly
A. Cheating – Cheating is defined as the improper
taking or tendering of any information or material which shall be used
to determine academic credit. Taking
of information includes, but is not limited to, copying graded homework
assignments from another student; working together with another
individual(s) on a take-home test or homework when not specifically
permitted by the instructor; looking or attempting to look at another
student’s paper during an examination; and looking or attempting to
look at text or notes during an examination when not permitted.
Tendering of information includes, but is not limited to, giving
your work to another student to be used or copied; giving someone
answers to exam questions either when the exam is being given or after
having taken an exam; giving or selling a term paper or other written
materials to another student; and sharing information on a graded
assignment.
Plagiarism – Plagiarism is defined as an attempt
to represent the work of another as the product of one’s own thought,
whether the other’s work is published or unpublished, or simply the
work of a fellow student. Plagiarism
includes, but is not limited to, quoting oral or written materials
without citation on an exam, term paper, homework, or other written
materials or oral presentations for an academic requirement; submitting
a paper which was purchased from a term paper service as your own work;
and submitting anyone else’s paper as your own work.
Copyright law – Violation of copyright law is
defined as an attempt to represent the work of another as the product of
one’s own thought, whether the other’s work is written or found on
the Internet or simply the work of a fellow student.
It is not limited to quoting oral or written materials. It includes photographs, clipart, and music samples. For an
academic requirement; submitting a paper, image, and/or music which was
copied from a website as your own work; submitting anyone else’s paper
as your own work is considered a breach of copyright law unless they
fall into the guidelines of the Teach Act http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/legislative/teachkit/
All class notes, lecture outlines, class assignments,
examinations, and any other course information are copyrighted material
and may not be copied or distributed in any format or for any purpose.
X.
COURSE CALENDAR - BY WEEK
TOP
Texts: McMillian,
James H. Classroom Assessment (3rd Edition).
Allyn and Bacon, 2004.
Costantino, Patricia M. and De Lorenzo, Marie N.
Developing a Professional Teaching Portfolio. Allyn and Bacon,
2002.
Resources:
Linn, Robert L. and Gronlund, Norman E. Measurement and
Assessment in Teaching (8th Edition). Prentice Hall, 2000.
Popham, James W. Classroom
Assessment (3rd Edition). Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
|
Week
|
Topics/Activities
|
Assignment for this Week
|
|
1
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 12; FTCE 25, 30; INTASC 8
Introduction
to course and requirements; Student Background and Expectations
(use KWL)
Project:
The Assessment Plan and Assessments
|
|
|
2
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 5, 12; FTCE 2, 25, 28, 30; INTASC 8
Assessment:
Context, Issues and Trends
The
Role of Assessment in Teaching
|
McMillan, Ch.1
Linn, Ch. 1, 2
|
|
3
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Establishing
Learning Targets/Instructional Goals and Objectives
|
McMillan, Ch.2 Linn, Ch. 3
|
|
4
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Establishing
High-Quality Classroom Assessments
Chapter
3 (McMillan) Case Study, p.64 (Small group)
Section
I (Curriculum) of Assessment Plan Due; Self, Peer, and
Instructor Analyses/Feedback
|
McMillan, Ch.3
Linn, Ch. 4, 5
|
|
5
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Assessment
Before and During Instruction
Chapter
4 (McMillan) Case Study, p. 95 (Small group)
Section
II (Students) of Assessment Plan Due; Self, Peer, and Instructor
Analyses/Feedback
|
McMillan, Ch. 4, 5
Linn, Ch. 6
|
|
6
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Assessing
Knowledge and Simple Understanding
Quiz
1: McMillan, Ch. 1-5 and Linn, Ch. 1-6
|
McMillan, Ch.6
Linn, Ch. 7, 8
|
|
7
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Assessing
Deep Understanding and Reasoning: Selected Response, Short
Answer, and Essay Items
Assembling,
Administering, and Appraising Classroom Tests
|
McMillan, Ch. 7
Linn, Ch. 9, 10, 14
|
|
8
|
FEAP
1; FTCE 25,30; INTASC
8
Assessing
Deep Understanding, Reasoning, and Skills:
Performance – Based Assessments
Individual
Analysis of Case Study
Section
III (Traditional Summative Assessment) of Assessment Plan Due;
Self, Peer, and Instructor Analyses/Feedback
|
McMillan, Ch. 8
Linn, Ch. 11
|
|
9
|
FEAP
1; FTCE 25,30; INTASC
8
Using
Portfolios to Assess Understanding, Reasoning, Skills and
Products
|
McMillan, Ch. 9
Linn, Ch. 12
|
|
10
|
FEAPs
1,4,5,7,19; FTCE 1,9,11,13,24,25; INTASC 2,3,7,8
Assessing
Affective Traits and Learning Targets
Section
IV (Alternate Performance Assessment) Due; Self, Peer, and
Instructor Analyses/Feedback
Quiz
2: McMillan, Ch.
6-10 and Linn, Ch. 7-14
|
McMillan, Ch. 10
Linn, Ch. 13
|
|
11
|
FEAP
1; FTCE 18,24; INTASC
8
Assessing
Mainstreamed Students
|
McMillan, Ch. 11
Linn, Ch. 15
|
|
12
|
FEAP
1; FTCE 18,24; INTASC
8
Grading
and Reporting
Administering
and Interpreting Standardized Tests
Section
V ( Remediation Plan) and VI (Reflections) of Assessment
Plan Due; Self, Peer, and Instructor Analyses/Feedback
|
McMillan, Ch 12, 13
Linn, Ch. 16-19
|
|
13
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 12; FTCE 25, 30; INTASC 8
Work
on Digital Portfolios/Lesson Plans
Quiz
3: McMillan, Ch.
11-13 and Linn, Ch. 15-19
|
|
|
14
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 12; FTCE 25, 30; INTASC 8
Finalized
Assessment Plan Due (FEAPs 1.01, 1.05, 3.03)
Assessment
Plan Presentations
Exercise:
Peer Evaluation and Analysis
|
Self,
Peer, and Instructor Evaluation and Analyses
|
|
15
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 12; FTCE 25, 30; INTASC 8
Assessment
Plan Presentations
Exercise:
Peer Evaluation and Analysis
|
Self,
Peer, and Instructor Evaluation and Analyses
|
|
16
|
FEAPs
1, 3, 12; FTCE 25, 30; INTASC 8
Bring
your written development plan based on your
self-analysis, instructor analysis and peer analyses.
Evaluation
of Course; Grade Conferences
|
Self,
Peer, and Instructor Analyses
|
XI.
MAJOR COURSE COMPETENCIES AND STANDARDS
TOP
|
Websites
Florida
Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAPs):
http://www.firn.edu/doe/dpe/publications/preprofessional4-99.pdf
Florida
Teacher Certification Exam Competencies (FTCE)
http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/ftce/pdf/ftcomp26.pdf
Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC): http://www.ccsso.org/contnet/pdfs/crorestrd.pdf
|
|
MAJOR COMPETENCIES
|
Florida Educator Accomplished Practices
|
Florida Teacher Certification Exam
|
INTASC Principles
|
|
1. The student
will demonstrate knowledge of the role of measurement, evaluation,
and assessment in the instructional process.
|
1, 5,
11
|
2, 28,
30
|
3.08,
8.01, 8.04, 8.05, 10.03
|
|
2. The student
will demonstrate comprehension of the principles of assessment.
|
1
|
24
|
8.03
|
|
3. The student
will demonstrate expertise in using methods that integrate
assessment and instruction to support learning.
|
1, 4,
5, 7, 10
|
1, 9,
11, 13, 24, 25
|
2.06,
3.03, 7.08, 8.02, 8.06, 8.07
|
|
4. The student
will demonstrate knowledge of standardized achievement tests.
|
1
|
18, 24
|
8.01,
8.03
|
|
5. The student
will demonstrate an understanding of other standardized tests
including ability, aptitude, interest and personality tests.
|
1, 11
|
1, 9
|
8.01,
8.06
|
|
6. The student
will demonstrate proficiency in performance assessment.
|
1
|
25, 30
|
8.01,
8.06
|
|
7. The student
will demonstrate expertise in portfolio assessment.
|
1, 12
|
25, 30
|
8.01,
8.06
|
|
8. The student
will demonstrate skill in reporting student performance.
|
1
|
1, 26
|
none
|
TOP
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT TEMPLATE
TOP
See
Rating Scales for Evaluation Criteria
Name of MDC Student ______________________________________________________________
I. CURRICULUM
General Unit Content: _______________________________________________________________
Specific Student Outcomes/Competencies: List
from 8 – 12 for the unit Focus on the main understandings, learning
processes, and attitudes expected from students.
Correlate each with the Sunshine State Benchmark and the
appropriate (NCTM, NSTA, CEC) national standards assessed.
II. STUDENTS
Subject Area, Grade Level (e.g., ESE, 9th grade)__________________________________
Description of Special Needs Student(s).
Indicate the number and types of special needs students (e.g., 4
ESOL, 1 ESE – visual difficulty)
Pre-Instruction Assessment:
Describe how will you determine prior knowledge and/or readiness for the
instruction? Will you use structured exercises, pretests, informal
observation, questions, standardized test(s), or another method? Will
they be fair (non-biased) for all students, practical,
efficient and promote student learning?
III. TRADITIONAL SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Items: Include
a variety of types with a minimum of 5 for each of the following:
completion, short answer, matching, binary choice (e.g., True/False,
agree/disagree), and multiple choice as well as 1 interpretive exercise
or essay
Test Blueprint: Create a table indicating the
unit content on the “x axis” and type of learning targets on the
“y axis”. Include the
number and percent of test items for each.
Directions and Format:
Write the directions and indicate the conditions of assessment
(Who will assess? How much time will students be given? What materials
or equipment are needed? Will students be permitted any help from the
teacher or peers?)
Scoring Methods:
Include procedures and scoring key for the traditional
assessment.
Assessment Accommodations:
Include for test directions, construction, administration,
site, grading and reporting as needed.
IV. ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Task: Select a task that integrates a number of skills and
understandings (multiple learning targets), focuses on higher-order
thinking, is relevant, realistic, developmentally appropriate, and
meaningful to students.
Scale and Scoring Methods: Include an analytic scale with clear criteria and procedures.
Assessment
Accommodations: Include for
test directions, construction, administration, site, grading and
reporting as needed.
V. REMEDIATION PLAN:
Describe the activities and re-assessment for those students
not meeting expected outcomes.
VI. REFLECTIONS:
What could be improved?
Where the competencies met by students?
Were appropriate accommodations made for ESOL and each type of
ESE students?
TOP
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT
RATING
SCALE FOR CURRICULUM
Name of Student ______________________________________________________________
Rating:
|
M
|
Absent or Minimally Demonstrated:
|
Is not demonstrated or is met in 1-2 instances.
|
|
P
|
Partially Demonstrated:
|
Meets some, but not all, criterion standard(s).
|
|
S
|
Satisfactorily Demonstrated:
|
Meets criterion standard(s).
|
|
E
|
Excellently Demonstrated:
|
Exceeds criterion standard(s) in an exceptional manner.
|
Circle the letter that demonstrates the above performance on
each criterion.
|
COMPONENT
|
CRITERION
|
RATING
|
|
Overall Description
|
Unit Content is stated in 1-2 phrases
|
M P
S E
|
|
Competencies
|
Are stated in specific, observable, measurable terms
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include action verbs that indicate what students will be
able to DO and KNOW at end of instruction
|
M P
S E
|
|
Focus on main understandings, learning processes, attitudes
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are sufficiently specific, yet comprehensive, to be
included in 8 – 12 competencies
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include several types of important learning (knowledge,
simple understanding, complex understanding/reasoning, skills, and
affect)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include clear criteria for level of performance
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are correlated with Sunshine State Standards
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are correlated with appropriate national standards
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are challenging, motivating, and appropriate for students
|
M P
S E
|
COMMENTS ON STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT
RATING
SCALE FOR STUDENTS
Name of Student ______________________________________________________________
Rating:
|
M
|
Absent or Minimally Demonstrated:
|
Is not demonstrated or is met in 1-2 instances.
|
|
P
|
Partially Demonstrated:
|
Meets some, but not all, criterion standard(s).
|
|
S
|
Satisfactorily Demonstrated:
|
Meets criterion standard(s).
|
|
E
|
Excellently Demonstrated:
|
Exceeds criterion standard(s) in an exceptional manner.
|
Circle the letter that demonstrates the above performance on
each criterion.
|
COMPONENT
|
CRITERION
|
RATING
|
|
Description
|
Includes subject area and grade level
|
M P
S E
|
|
Indicates the number and types of special needs students
(e.g., 4 ESOL, 1 ESE – visual difficulty)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Pre-Instruction Assessments
|
Are appropriate for the described students
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are appropriate for the different types of learning targets
(knowledge, simple understanding, complex understanding/reasoning,
skills, and affect)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include multiple methods over time to strengthen validity
and reliability
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are fair (non-biased) for all students
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are practical and efficient
|
M P
S E
|
|
Promote student learning
|
M P
S E
|
|
Assessment Accommodations are included
for test directions, construction, administration, site,
grading and reporting as needed
|
M P
S E
|
COMMENTS ON STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT
RATING
SCALE FOR TRADITIONAL SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Name of Student ______________________________________________________________
Rating:
|
M
|
Absent or Minimally Demonstrated:
|
Is not demonstrated or is met in 1-2 instances.
|
|
P
|
Partially Demonstrated:
|
Meets some, but not all, criterion standard(s).
|
|
S
|
Satisfactorily Demonstrated:
|
Meets criterion standard(s).
|
|
E
|
Excellently Demonstrated:
|
Exceeds criterion standard(s) in an exceptional manner.
|
Circle the letter that demonstrates the above performance on
each criterion.
|
COMPONENT
|
CRITERION
|
RATING
|
|
Test Blueprint
|
Uses correct format with unit content on “x axis” and
type of learning targets on the “y axis”
|
M P
S E
|
|
Indicates the number and percent of test items for each
(See Chapter 3, McMillan, 2003.)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Items
|
Are appropriately matched to student competencies as
indicated by action verb in competencies
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are appropriately matched to type of learning target
(knowledge, simple understanding, complex understanding/reasoning,
skills, and affect) (See Assessment Method Scorecard, Chapter 3,
McMillan, 2003)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are a representative sample of the different learning
targets
(See Chapter 6, McMillan, 2003)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include a variety of types with a minimum of 5 for each of
the following: completion, short answer, matching, binary choice
(e.g., True/False, agree/disagree), and multiple choice as well as
1 interpretive exercise or essay
|
M P
S E
|
|
Are appropriate in number and length for the students
|
M P
S E
|
|
Conform to the criteria for writing items of each type (See
Chapter 6 and 7, McMillan, 2003)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Directions
|
Are clear and easy to read
|
M P
S E
|
|
Include the purpose of the test, time allowed, procedures
for answering, and
how items will be scored
|
M P
S E
|
|
Format
|
Makes the test easy to read and complete
|
M P
S E
|
|
Scoring Key
|
Includes answers and scoring for each item
|
M P
S E
|
|
Assessment
Accommodations
|
Are included for
test directions, construction, administration, site, grading and
reporting as needed
|
M P
S E
|
COMMENTS ON STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT (Use reverse
side):
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT
RATING
SCALE FOR ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Name of Student ______________________________________________________________
Rating:
|
M
|
Absent or Minimally Demonstrated:
|
Is not demonstrated or is met in 1-2 instances.
|
|
P
|
Partially Demonstrated:
|
Meets some, but not all, criterion standard(s).
|
|
S
|
Satisfactorily Demonstrated:
|
Meets criterion standard(s).
|
|
E
|
Excellently Demonstrated:
|
Exceeds criterion standard(s) in an exceptional manner.
|
Circle the letter that demonstrates the above performance on
each criterion.
|
COMPONENT
|
CRITERION
|
RATING
|
|
Task
|
Integrates a number of skills and understandings (multiple
learning targets)
|
M P
S E
|
|
Focuses on higher-order thinking or complex learning
|
M P
S E
|
|
Describes clearly the content and skill targets to be
assessed
|
M P
S E
|
|
Is relevant to student competencies
|
M P
S E
|
|
Is realistic and meaningful to students
|
M P
S E
|
|
Is suitable for time, equipment, and resources available
|
M P
S E
|
|
Is developmentally appropriate for students
|
M P
S E
|
|
Permits multiple solutions
|
M P
S E
|
|
Scale
|
Is analytic
|
M P
S E
|
|
Scoring
|
Criteria focus on important aspects of performance
|
M P
S E
|
|
Criteria are clear
|
M P
S E
|
|
Method is clear
|
M P
S E
|
|
Assessment
Accommodations
|
Are included for
test directions, construction, administration, site, grading and
reporting as needed
|
M P
S E
|
COMMENTS ON STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
MIAMI
DADE COLLEGE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
EDF
4430 ASSESSMENT PROJECT
RATING
SCALE FOR STUDENT REMEDIATION PLAN
AND
PRE-SERVICE TEACHER REFLECTION
Name of Student ______________________________________________________________
Rating:
|
M
|
Absent or Minimally Demonstrated:
|
Is not demonstrated or is met in 1-2 instances.
|
|
P
|
Partially Demonstrated:
|
Meets some, but not all, criterion standard(s).
|
|
S
|
Satisfactorily Demonstrated:
|
Meets criterion standard(s).
|
|
E
|
Excellently Demonstrated:
|
Exceeds criterion standard(s) in an exceptional manner.
|
Circle the letter that demonstrates the above performance on
each criterion.
|
COMPONENT
|
CRITERION
|
RATING
|
|
STUDENT REMEDIATION PLAN
|
Includes appropriate additional and relevant activities for
students not meeting expected outcomes
|
M P
S E
|
|
Includes appropriate re-assessment for students not meeting
expected outcomes
|
M P
S E
|
|
PRE-SERVICE TEACHER REFLECTION
|
Includes strengths of assessment project
|
M P
S E
|
|
Includes areas of needed improvement in assessment project
|
M P
S E
|
|
Is thoughtful and thorough
|
M P
S E
|
COMMENTS ON STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
TOP
|