|
|
Instructor:
|
Maria
M. Sifre-McMann
|
|
Office:
|
School
of Education
Miami-Dade
College
7-50
NW 15th Street 33136
|
|
Phone
|
(786)
624-7190
|
|
E-mail:
|
mcmann8325@bellsouth.net
|
|
Text:
|
Overton,
Terry (2003), Assessing Learners with Special Needs: an Applied
Approach.
Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gibb,
G. and Dyches, T. (2000). Guide to Writing Quality
Individualized Education Programs. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
|
EEX
4221 Educational Assessment of Exceptional Students
Fall
2004
This
syllabus, course calendar, and other attending documents are subject to
change during the semester in the event of extenuating circumstances.
Course
Prefix & Number: EEX 4221
Credit
Hours: Three (3)
Co/Prerequisites:
EEX 3010, EDF 4430
Date
& Time: T, R 5:40 PM TO 6:55 PM
Professor
Information: María M. Sifre-McMann e-mail: mcmann8325@bellsouth.net
I.
COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is a study of theory and
practice of informal and formal assessment of behavior and/or learning
problems. Practice with evaluation instruments and curriculum based
assessment strategies are key components of the course. Use of
assessment information in designing academic K-12 curriculum plans is
taught.
II.
COURSE COMPETENCIES:
UP
1.
The student will demonstrate an understanding of legal and ethical issues
surrounding special education assessment by:
-
reviewing
legislation and landmark cases which have shaped practices in
exceptional student education.
-
writing
opinions of what would constitute ethical behavior in realistic
situations.
-
discussing
the public trust placed in all teachers, but particularly teachers of
the most vulnerable students.
-
practicing
ethical, professional behaviors when evaluating a K-12 student,
including maintaining confidentiality, reporting valid, reputable data
and communicating results in a professional manner.
2.
The student will demonstrate an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses
and uses of a wide variety of formal and informal evaluation techniques
and instruments by:
-
analyzing
the educational uses of informal assessment, curriculum-based
assessment, portfolio assessment, norm-referenced tests,
criterion-referenced tests, ecological assessment, learning styles
assessment and behavioral assessments/rating scales.
-
interpreting
basic statistical data and scoring terminology.
-
appraising
the usefulness of various techniques/instruments in a school setting.
3.
The student will demonstrate an understanding of how to administer and
score formal evaluation instruments by:
-
shadowing
and coaching another student as s/he performs and scores a mock
administration of at least one formal evaluation instrument.
-
administering
two formal evaluation instruments to a K-12 student, scoring them,
writing a professional report including suggestions for academic
planning, and sharing this report with the K-12 student’s
teacher(s).
4.
The student will demonstrate an understanding of the relationships between
basic assessment concepts, human development, and effective exceptional
educational planning by:
-
justifying
choices of evaluation instruments/techniques for use in case studies
of students of different ages and with different challenges.
-
constructing
a mock IEP reflecting a K-12 student’s developmental stage.
5.
The student will demonstrate an understanding of the evaluation process
including contributing to Child Study Teams, interpreting test data,
diagnosing a suspected disability, conferring with and sharing evaluations
with parents, and writing Individual Educational Plans (IEP) by:
-
creating
a flow chart with details about each step of the evaluation process.
-
listing
key diagnostic points for major disability categories.
-
practicing
professional presentation of observations and professional
consultation skills needed when working with parents and other
professionals.
-
writing
a mock IEP based on specific case study information.
III.
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK(S), RESOURCES AND MATERIALS
UP
Overton,
Terry (2003), Assessing Learners with Special Needs: an Applied Approach.
Columbus,
Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall. (ISBN: 0-13-769373-7)
Gibb,
G. and Dyches, T. (2000). Guide to Writing Quality Individualized
Education Programs. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
III.
SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS AND REFERENCES
Cooper,
J. and TenBrink, T. (2003). Educator’s Guide to Classroom
Assessment
Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
FL
DOE. (2000). Developing Quality Individual Educational Plans.
Tallahassee, FL.
IV.
METHODS OF INSTRUCTION
Instruction
will consist of: lecture, class discussion, case study, role-playing,
reflective writing, mock administrations, and group projects.
V.
TECHNOLOGY/AUDIO/VIDEO
Some
electronic scoring may or may not be available, depending upon the
instrument assigned.
VI.
SUPPLIES
Class
assignments require some supplies and/or copies.
VII.
CHILD-BASED EXPERIENCE
SOE
students will be expected to provide a “subject” for practice academic
testing. The subject tested cannot be related to the evaluator in
any way, but classmates may exchange subjects. This testing will be
completed during class time, on campus and under supervision. There
will be two instruments administered. Parental permission must be
obtained. A report of the testing will be written and, after the
report is approved by the instructor, the evaluator will share this with
the child’s parent (s).
VIII.COURSE
REQUIREMENTS & EXPECTATIONS
UP
A.
ATTENDANCE & WITHDRAWAL POLICY
Students
are required to attend class. Up to the date of the last day to
withdraw, a student may be dropped because of excessive absences with four
(4) or more hours of absences. After this last drop date, no
"W" grade will be given. Due to the participatory nature
of this course, attendance is essential.
B.
ASSIGNMENTS
UP
Work
is expected to be of college quality. Papers are to be
electronically processed, with pages stapled together and a cover sheet or
electronically e-mailed or put in course assignment drop box. Since
prospective teachers will eventually serve as role models for their own
students, written work will be evaluated on the basis of the proper
grammar, spelling and usage, content, etc. Assignments are due the
class period for which they are required.
C.
EXAMS
Exams
will include information from class lectures, class activities and the
course text(s) and supplemental materials. Class lectures will not
always review information from the students’ reading assignments.
It is the responsibility of School of Education student to read the text,
ask questions, and take notes during lectures and group presentations.
Students who miss chapter tests, previously announced quizzes, or other
major assignments on scheduled dates may or may not be permitted to make
them up.
D.
GRADING SCALE
UP
The
grading scale for the School of Education is:
|
100-90
|
(500-
450 points)
|
A
|
|
89-80
|
(449-
400 points)
|
B
|
|
79-70
|
(399-
350 points)
|
C
|
|
69-60
|
(349-
300 points)
|
D
(Repeat Course)
|
|
59
and below
|
(below
300 points)
|
F
(Repeat Course)
|
A
grade of I (incomplete) can be assigned only under the following
conditions.
1.
The student requests the grade of incomplete.
2.
The student has completed all exams up to that time with the possible
exception of the last unit exam and/or the final exam.
3.
The student has completed all assignments up to that time.
4.
The student has at least a C average up to that time.
5.
The circumstances that prevent the student from completing the course by
the end of the term must be extenuating and documentable.
6.
The student must agree to make up the missing work by a date specified by
the instructor or by the end of the next major term, whichever is earlier.
This agreement must be formalized by completing the College’s Agreement
for a Grade of Incomplete form.
E.
REQUIRED ASSESSMENTS “How you earn your grade”
UP
|
160
points
|
Eight
chapter exercises @20 points each. (ESE FSAC 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 4.2)
|
|
20
points
|
Summary
paper, Laws and ethical standards in the administration and use of
assessments (ESE FSAC 1.1, 1.2) This paper should address
issues such as PL 94-142, IDEA, FAPE, Standards of Practice,
evaluation, parent involvement, procedural safeguards, assessment
and non-discriminatory tests, due process, Section 504, and
LRE/Inclusion.
|
|
20
points
|
Summary
paper: Assessing ESOL and Minority Students’Representation in
Norming Populations of Standardized Tests (ESE FSAC 2.6)
|
|
50
points
|
Exam
1 (ESE FSAC 2.1, 3.1)
|
|
50
points
|
IEP
Workbook (Gibb), must include ESOL strategies that may appear in an
IEP (ESE FSAC 1.3, 1.6, 2.4, 3.1, 6.1, 6.3)
|
|
50
points
|
You
will be given evaluation reports of two students - one report will
be about an ESOL student; the other report will be authentic
information from a local student. You are to write an IEP for
the ESOL student. After receiving feedback from this IEP,
write an IEP for your other student (will differ between class
members). Evaluation is based on IEP grading rubric.
(ESE FSAC 1.3, 2.3, 2.4, 2.6, 6.1)
|
|
30
points
|
Practice
test with peer and report of evaluation - You will administer
portions of various evaluation instruments to classmates acting as
elementary aged students. Mock reports will be written based
on mock results. Professor observation of administration and
correct scoring procedures will determine grade.
|
|
50
points
|
Using
a K-12 student, you will administer and score assessment
instruments, interpret results, and write a report summarizing the
results and making suggestions for academic planning. See
Final Performance Assessment description sheet. (ESE FSAC 2.4)
|
|
50
points
|
Written
Exam (Chapter 6-12 omit Chapter 11, plus Mock Child Study Team)
(ESE FSAC 1.6, 2.4, 4.2)
|
|
|
500
TOTAL points possible
|
**All
assignments must be successfully completed in order to pass the class.**
See course calendar for other assignments required in the course. If an
assignment does not receive a grade of C or above, the instructor will
work with the student to improve the understanding of the concept and
performance of the assignment until passing work is produced.
VIII.
ALTERNATE INSTRUCTION/LEARNING SUPPORT CENTERS
Students
who need help completing assignments or with work in-class are encouraged
to seek help at their campus support centers.
IX.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) STATEMENT:
Students
who have a disability that might affect their performance in this class
are encouraged to contact Access Services at this campus, in confidence,
as soon as possible.
X.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
UP
Please
be aware that I support the College’s policies about academic integrity
and honesty.
This
includes its policies regarding cheating, plagiarism, and fabrication of
information. It is your responsibility to fully understand what those
policies are; as such, you are encouraged to get a copy of and read these
policies carefully and thoroughly (Student Rights and Responsibilities
Handbook.)
A.
Cheating - The improper taking or tendering of any information or
material which shall be used to determine academic credit. Taking of
information includes, but is not limited to, copying graded homework
assignments from another student; working together with another
individual(s) on a take-home test or homework when not specifically
permitted by the instructor; looking or attempting to look at another
student’s paper during an examination and; looking or attempting to look
at text or notes during an examination when not permitted. Tendering
of information includes, but is not limited to, giving your work to
another student to be used or copied; giving someone answers to exam
questions either when the exam is being given or after having taken an
exam; giving or selling a term paper or other written materials to another
student; sharing information on a graded assignment.
B.
Plagiarism - The attempt to represent the work of another as the
product of one’s own thought, whether the other’s work is published or
unpublished, or simply the work of a fellow student. Plagiarism
includes, but is not limited to, quoting oral or written materials without
citation on an exam, term paper, homework, or other written materials or
oral presentations for an academic requirement; submitting a paper which
was purchased from a term paper service as your own work; submitting
anyone else’s paper as your own work.
C.
Copyright law - The attempt to represent the work of another as the
product of one’s own thought, whether the other’s work is written or
found on the Internet or simply the work of a fellow student, violates the
copyright laws. It is not limited to quoting oral or written materials, it
includes photographs, clipart and music samples. For an academic
requirement; submitting a paper, image, and/or music which was copied from
website as your own work; submitting anyone else’s paper as your own
work is considered a breach of copyright laws unless they fall into the
guidelines of the Teach Act
http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/legislative/teachkit/
All
class notes, lecture outlines, class assignments, examinations, and any
other course information are copyrighted material and may not be copied or
distributed in any format or for any purpose.
XII.
COURSE CALENDAR
UP
|
DATE
OF CLASS / WEEK
|
TOPICS
|
DUE
NEXT TIME
|
|
WEEK
1
|
Overview
of course, content, web site visitIntroduction to Assessment, Chap 1
|
Read
Chapter 1 and 2
You
must hand in “Think Ahead” sections for each chapter. The top 8
grades will count in your final grade.
|
|
WEEK
2
|
Laws,
Ethics, and Issues, Chap 2
|
Read
Chapter 3 Summary Paper: Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment
|
|
WEEK
3
|
Descriptive
Statistics, Chap. 3
|
Read
Chapter 4
|
|
WEEK
4
|
Reliability
and Validity, Chap. 4
|
Prepare
for test on statisticsRead Chapter 5
|
|
WEEK
5
|
Test
1Introduction to Norm Referenced Assessment, Chap. 5
|
Read
Chapter 6
|
|
WEEK
6
|
Tests
of Educational Achievement, Chapter 6
|
Research
your assigned standardized test. Be sure to find out minority
representation in the norming group. Be ready to share.
|
|
WEEK
7
|
Practice
scoring and interpreting simulated assessments
|
Summary
Paper: Over identification of ESOL and minority students
as ESE (including effects of representation in norming populations
of standardized tests) Read Chapter 7
|
|
WEEK
8
|
Standardized
Diagnostic Testing, Chapter 7
|
Read
Chapter 8
|
|
WEEK
9
|
Informal
Assessment Techniques, Chapter 8Introduction of “Guide to Writing
Quality IEP’s”Brainstorm: ESOL strategies that may appear on an
IEP
|
Read
Chapter 9Work on IEP workbook regularly from now on. Due
November 30
|
|
WEEK
10
|
Assessment
of Behavior
|
Read
Chapter 10
|
|
WEEK
11
|
Measures
of Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior
|
Read
Chapter 12
|
|
WEEK
12
|
Interpreting
Assessment for Educational Interventions
|
Prepare
for Exam Chap 6-10 &12
|
|
WEEK
13
|
EXAM,
Chapters 6-10 & 12 (11/16)Review of testing techniques/best
practices/ common errors in administration and scoring
|
IEP
book due Nov. 30
|
FOR
THE FOLLOWING FIVE DAYS, GROUPS WILL ROTATE THROUGH ACTIVITIES.
ABBREVIATION KEY:
|
PP
=
|
Peer
Practice – Practice administering a standardized instrument on a
peer.
|
|
CS/BK
=
|
Work
on the Case Study from the IEP Workbook
|
|
CS/IEP
=
|
Given
case study information about an ESOL/ESE student, write an IEP.
|
|
Admin
T=
|
Administer
two standardized assessments to your testing subject.
|
|
Report
=
|
Using
the information from your assessment of a K-12 child, write a report
interpreting results.
|
|
|
(See
assignment sheet.)
|
Assignments
are due the next class meeting after your group performs the activity.
|
Date
|
GROUP
A
|
GROUP
B
|
GROUP
C
|
GROUP
D
|
GROUP
E
|
|
Nov.
18
|
PP
|
PP
|
CS/BK
|
CS/BK
|
CS/BK
|
|
Nov.
30
|
ADMIN
T
|
ADMIN
T
|
PP
|
PP
|
PP
|
|
Dec.
2
|
REPORT
|
REPORT
|
ADMIN
T
|
CS/IEP
|
CS/IEP
|
|
Dec.
7
|
CS/BK
|
CS/BK
|
REPORT
|
ADMIN
T
|
|